The True North Times
  • Ineligible for the Supreme Court
  • Now with 60 minute hours!
  • Winnipeg? There?
  • It's Dynamite!
  • First to podcast with Wilfrid Laurier
  • Peter Mansbridge’s bathroom reading material
  • Exporting Beaver Hides to the Metropol since 1608
  • Yet to be castrated by Margaret Wente
  • For the sophisticated hoser
  • The only thing that Andrew Coyne DOESN'T hate

Meet Martin Barker, Conservative candidate for Cowichan—Malahat—Langford in British Columbia. He has a blog– or, rather, had a blog. He chronicled his life as the most interesting man in Duncan, BC (the smallest city in square kilometers in Canada). He likes talking about chickens. A lot. What’s more interesting is his self-proclaimed rants that include kind words to our Quebecois brothers.

 

TNT_Scandal_MartinBarker_4

 

You’ll have to excuse the ugly-looking excerpt. We retrieved his blog posts from an archive of his website. Once he was made a candidate, we assume the Conservative party took down and scrubbed his website clean. In fact, his Facebook page and website are nothing but dead links now.

So what exactly did he say in that wall of text? Barker discusses his opposition to a British Columbia Early Child Care plan. As a staunch fiscal conservative, he believes it’s inappropriate for such an expense during “economic uncertainty.”

After all… “BC is not Quebec, we do not and will never get the 11+ billion dollars of equalization to finance our social programs.”

That could be interpreted as him stating (what he thinks) is pure fact. Nothing malicious. Yet, when you dig deeper into his other blog posts…

 

TNT_Scandal_MartinBarker_1

 

Riding growth could indeed be a problem. Why do we have to create so many new ridings when the population grows?

If Quebec doesn’t get its way, they make “a big stink.” A certain, odeur de l’âne, if you will. He finds irony in Quebec’s slow growth given their extensive social systems. What the hell are they spending all that money on? René Levesque shrines?

[I’m] just not impressed by how much it costs the rest of the country to have [Quebec]

Meanwhile, Barker thinks MPs could do just as well with ridings 50% bigger. Have you met current Members of Parliament? Somehow I don’t think they could handle the responsibility of an extra office plant, let alone 50% bigger constituencies.

Listen. Barker isn’t really a Quebec basher. He’s “generally proud” of his Quebec friends and their province. What really irks him is “how much it costs the rest of the country to have them.” It sure is costly to have Quebec in the federation. We should have a referendum or something about it.

Or instead, we could have another one of Barker’s rants:

 

TNT_Scandal_MartinBarker_2

 

There we go. That’s perfect. We “pour money down that money pit in Quebec.” Eloquent yet substantive.

 

The rest of the country is going to continue to want to pour money down that money pit in Quebec

 

If his serenade and sarabande with La Belle Province wasn’t enough, there’s more! Remember when Conservative MP Wai Young said Bill C-51 would have prevented the Air India bombings from happening? Martin Barker was saying that way before it was mainstream. What a trend-setter. (Thanks to Robert Jago for the screengrab of the now-deleted Facebook post)

 

TNT_Scandal_MartinBarker3

 

All in all, Martin Barker is definitely proud of Quebec. Except all that negative stuff he pointed out.

 

BACK TO CANDIDATE HUB

  • HLA-ABC

    I find the fact that he considers healthcare and education to be “luxuries” to be the scariest thing of all.

    • Sam

      For some people in other countries healthcare and education are luxuries. We are lucky to live in Canada.

  • tee

    Not a big deal.